Community
We convene the people who need AI research they can defend (analysts, clinical researchers, litigators, compliance officers, consultants) around a shared standard. The product is the natural tool of that practice, not the point of the community.
The Founding Researchers program is a named early-adopter cohort: the first practitioners committed enough to help set the standard while the platform is young. Scarcity is intentional: a capped, identifiable cohort becomes the reference sellers for everyone who joins after.
Every incentive is something we can afford at solo-founder scale, and several are self-funding. Contribution earns real value, not points.
Bug reports, methodology feedback, and source-quality flags earn run credits on Veridok.
Badge, public listing, and a charter pricing lock for the first 25 committed early users.
Domain experts who help refine a research methodology get named, versioned attribution. Career capital, not a footnote.
Later phase: experts who author methodologies others pay to run earn a revenue share, with named attribution on the published method.
Get a fabricated citation past verification in the public challenge and earn a bounty plus public credit.
Community members whose organization has a real use case get a discounted first engagement.
Publish a redacted run and writeup and get editing plus promotion support. Never published without written permission.
Run credits on both sides for any user who refers a new practitioner.
Discounted Deep runs for verified students and graduate researchers, seeding the next generation on our standard.
Active community members steer which research area ships next. Roadmap transparency, not a suggestion box.
Launch sequence: run credits, Founding Researchers, and the adversarial challenge first. Methodology co-authorship follows in month two to three. Named-author revenue share follows once the Pro tier is live.
Flagship community event
This is the community engine behind "provably accountable AI." Nobody else can run this challenge without exposing their own capability state.
We publish our own 1,000-hostile-prompt run against the citation gate, with the full methodology and failure count. Honest, including the failures and the fixes.
A standing bounty for anyone who gets a fabricated citation past verification. Submissions require a reproducible prompt; results are published monthly.
A virtual, low-cost gathering where the researchers who found the best breaks present them to the community.
Bounty budget: up to $2,500 per quarter
Cheaper than any ad campaign. Every failed attempt is marketing evidence; every success hardens the product.
Open methodology library
We publish the research methodologies (the steps, the quality gates, the rubrics) as public, citable documents with attribution. Competitors who hide their capability state can't publish their methods; we can, because the execution is what we sell.
Systematic-review-shaped phases and quality gates
The rubrics behind structural workflow analysis
How evidence and workflow findings become recommendations
Evidence Search Studio, Evidence Fact Extraction & Validation, and Evidence Report Synthesis are published as a v1 sample, with representative steps and an academic research basis.
Browse the library