Community

The methodology is teachable. The engine is the product.

We publish the phases, the quality gates, and the academic research basis behind the evidence pipeline as public, versioned, citable documents, with attribution. Competitors who hide their capability state can't publish their methods this way; we can, because the execution is what we sell, not the recipe.

Published

Phase names and sequencing, the quality gates and rubric anchors each phase enforces, and the specific academic literature (with DOIs) each phase's design is grounded in.

Not published

Prompt text, model routing logic, and the internal orchestration mechanics that execute each phase. That's the product, and it's under active IP protection (U.S. provisional filed 25 August 2026; a second application remains at counsel).

Evidence Search Studio

27 phases · interactive, gated

Interactive, step-by-step evidence search with full PRISMA flow tracking, multi-provider search, citation/DOI verification, and quality assessment, built for going from a question to qualified evidence in a single session, with a human review gate at every stage that matters (query, results, screening criteria, quality, and basis).

Representative phase sequence

  1. 01Domain classification and search strategy
  2. 02Structured question extraction (PICO is one clinical form)
  3. 03Source recommendation & query formulation (human gate)
  4. 04Multi-provider search execution & yield check
  5. 05Relevance scoring & DOI/retraction verification
  6. 06Screening criteria & full-text screening (human gate)
  7. 07Risk-of-bias assessment & GRADE certainty rating
  8. 08Basis assembly & export (human gate)

Research basis (excerpt)

  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  • Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, v6.4. Cochrane, 2023. training.cochrane.org/handbook

Attribution: Evidentia Platform Engineering

Evidence Fact Extraction and Validation

5 phases · independently re-checked

Extracts structured factual claims from included-study abstracts, validates each claim against its source by an independent re-check, aggregates cross-study entities, metrics, and contradictions, and applies a quality gate, producing a defensible fact table with claim-level traceability for downstream synthesis.

What each phase enforces

  • Claim extraction is source-anchored, not free-form summarization
  • Each claim is independently re-checked against its source by a separate model pass
  • Cross-study contradictions are surfaced, not silently averaged away
  • A deterministic gate blocks low-confidence fact tables from reaching synthesis

Research basis (excerpt)

  • Higgins JPT, et al. (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, v6.4, Ch. 5: Collecting Data. Cochrane, 2023. training.cochrane.org/handbook
  • Lippi M, Torroni P. (2016). Argumentation Mining: State of the Art and Emerging Trends. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 16(2), 1-25. doi.org/10.1145/2850417
  • Pherson RH, Heuer RJ Jr. Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis, 3rd ed. CQ Press, 2019. sagepub.com

Attribution: Evidentia Platform Engineering · 12 sources cited in the full research basis

Evidence Report Synthesis

9 phases · GRADE-anchored

Takes a validated fact table and cross-study aggregation and synthesizes it into a structured, defensible report, with certainty ratings on the underlying evidence, not just a narrative summary of what the sources said.

What each phase enforces

  • Cross-study aggregation happens before narrative framing, not after
  • Every synthesized claim carries a GRADE-style certainty rating
  • A human review gate sits between draft synthesis and final report

Research basis (excerpt)

  • Higgins JPT, et al. (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, v6.4, Ch. 12: Synthesizing and presenting findings. Cochrane, 2023. training.cochrane.org/handbook
  • Neumann I, Schünemann H (eds). The GRADE Book, version 1.0. The GRADE Working Group, 2024. book.gradepro.org
  • Lewin S, Booth A, Munthe-Kaas H, et al. (2018). Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings. Implementation Science, 13(Suppl 1):2. doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0688-3

Attribution: Evidentia Platform Engineering · 20 sources cited in the full research basis

Discuss the methodology, not just read it

A practitioner forum for run showcases and methodology critique opens alongside the first published library view. See the community program for the launch sequence.

Three methodologies shown here as a v1 sample, not the full library. More publish as the site build progresses.